![]() With Iorveth however, he's in it for a vision, he is pursuing a worthy goal. He doesn't use violence as a last resort (something Geralt does IMHO), but seems to think it's the only way to approach most situations. He's basically the Jack Bauer of the Witcherverse. But that's certainly a predominant trait of Roche. I never like people who act first and think later. Roche also lost lots of sympathy with me, when he just attacks the group at the elven statue (where you have to choose between Iorveth and Roche for the first time) and starts killing everyone. Roche is somewhat okay in my book too, but ultimately he is just a patriot who is loyal to a now dead king (and might be disposed of himself soon, depending on whom grabs power next), which puts his goals dangerously close to a fools errant. I think CDPR did a good job in balancing the paths, personally i will go with Iorveth' s as my favourite but i equally enjoyed Roche 's for totally different reasons ( like hating everyone ). Seem to lack detail and political intrigue ( which of course does make sense since you are with the rebels and not conspiring royals ). Most characters are nice, even Philippa and even if you know that something is wrong with her from the very start. Iorveth 's path is somewhat less easy going but quests are more fun, also you get to play the siege, make some huge choices about the prince and crossing the mist isn't that annoying. Roche 's path makes much more sense story wise if you exclude the fact that you don't get to really meet Saschia, also the ending is kind of more open, Roche is indeed a patriot but i am not sure if Geralt is and almost all the characters ( Odren excluded) are asses and hated every one of them, if felt like reading the codex funny butthurt kind of thing I recently ended the Roche part, i have chosen squirrel's in first game and so did in the second mostly because i want to play a mutant that pursuing people but even with cold heart i had to see the other side of the coin. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |